(No Ratings Yet)
Loading...0 views
Updated: August 5th, 2020 | South Salem | Lawyer List A | Law Offices of Annette G. Hasapidis | Appellate, Litigation,
The current rating on Annette G. Hasapidis is
(No Ratings Yet)Loading...And receives 0 page views
Address: , south-salem, NY, 10590
Law Firm: Law Offices of Annette G. Hasapidis
Phone: 855-346-1076
Fax: 914-801-4269
Email:
Website: http://www.nyappellateattorneys.com
| Title | Member |
| First Year of Call | |
| Areas of Practice | Appellate, Litigation |
| Description | Professional Experience- Law Offices of Annette G. Hasapidis, South Salem, New York: Owner, 1999 Present- Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, New York, New York: Senior Associate, 1995 1999 – Westchester County Attorney, White Plains, New York: Assistant County Attorney, 19941995 – Kings County District Attorney, Brooklyn, New York: Assistant District Attorney, 19911994Professional Associations and Memberships- Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America – Women’s Bar Association of the State of New York, 2004 Present- Officer, 2012-2014 – Co-Chair Legislation Committee, 2008 2012- Co-Chair Judiciary Committee, 2006 2008- New York State Trial Lawyer’s Association, 2010 Present- Executive Board, 2011 – Present- Co-Chair, Amicus Committee- New York State Bar Association, Member, 1999 Present- Committee on Courts of Appellate Jurisdiction, Member, 2011 – Present- Westchester County Women’s Bar Association, 1999 Present- Vice President, 2011 – 2012- Recording Secretary, 2010 2011- Chair, Appellate Practice Committee, 2007 2011- Westchester County Bar Association, Member, 1999 Present- Pace University School of Law’s Women’s Justice Center’s ‘The Friends of Gail,’ Executive Board Member, 2007 Present.- Northern Westchester Bar Association, 2007 Present- Dutchess County Bar Association, 2007 Present- White Plains Bar Association, 2009 Present- Rotary International, 2015- Ridgefield Chamber of Commerce, Chair, 2014-PresentRepresentative Cases- In Weiss v Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co., 98 AD3d 1107 (2d Dep’t 2016), the Second Department reversed its earlier precedent and held that SUM insurance coverage should not be offset by payments from a non-motor vehicle bodily injury insurance policy.- In Palydowycz v Palydowycz, 138 AD3d 810 (2d Dep’t 2016), the Appellate Division, Second Department, held that the husband’s medical practices hold a value, distinct from the income stream that the medical practices generated. As a result, the wife was entitled to maintenance based on the income stream from the practices in addition to a share of the value of the medical practices themselves. This ruling constituted a departure from the Second Department’s earlier decisions on this issue.- In Auqui v. Seven Thirty One Limited Partnership, 22 N.Y.3d 246 (2013), Ms. Hasapidis represented a worker who was injured when a sheet of plywood fell from a 50-story- high construction site and struck him on the head as he walked down a New York City street. On February 14, 2013,, the Court of Appeals, for the first time, granted collateral estoppel effect to Decisions of the workers’ compensation board in third-party actions regarding disability issues. The Decision jeopardized the right to a jury trial on those issues and would have a serious impact on the ability of injured workers to seek justice through the court system, while also undermining the workers’ compensation system. Ms. Hasapidis requested that the Court of Appeals grant reargument of its Decision and Order, which is rarely granted. Yet, the Court granted reargument and, after a second round of briefing and oral argument, the Court unanimously vacated the earlier Decision, and held that a determination of the workers’ compensation board as to duration of disability could not be granted preclusive effect.- Perl v. Meher, 2011 WL 5838721 (2011) (holding, inter alia, that in a threshhold personal injury case, a plaintiff is not required to proffer contemporaneous numerical measurements of range of motion in order to defeat summary judgment) – Natiello v. Carrion, 73 A.D.3d 1070 (2d Dep’t 2010) (annulling determination that mother failed to provide adequate supervision of her 16 year old autistic son and had committed educational neglect of her other emotionally disturbed son) – Verdugo v. Seven Thirty One Ltd. Partnership, 70 A.D.3d 600 (1st Dep’t 2010) (dismissing the ‘act of God’ affirmative defense, and determining that the existence of 30 mph winds, which caused plywood to become airborne and strike Plaintiff in the head, was not an ‘unusual, extraordinary and unprecedented event’). – Valdez ex rel. Donely v. U.S., 518 F.3d. 173 (2d Cir. 2008) (reinstating a plaintiffs’ medical malpractice action as timely based upon federal accrual and equitable estoppel rules). – Ellis v. Chao, 336 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2003) (finding that candidate for a union election raised a question of fact whether the Secretary of Labor’s decision not to sue to set aside a union election was arbitrary and capricious). – Galanos v. Galanos, 20 A.D.3d 450 (2d Dep’t 2005) (disqualifying the husband’s counsel in a matrimonial action who had represented the wife’s father in prior proceedings; the first case in New York to find that a father and child’s finances were so inextricably intertwined as to justify disqualification). – Massimi v. Massimi, 35 A.D.3d 400 (2d Dep’t 2006) (ruling that the husband had commingled marital and separate property, thereby entitling the wife to a distributive award of that property). – Xiao Yang Chen v. Fischer, 6 N.Y.3d 94 (2005) (as amicus curiae counsel for the Women’s Bar of the State of New York) (ruling that joinder of tort claims in a matrimonial action is permissive, not mandatory). Professional Acknowledgements- AV*-Rated by Martindale-Hubbell’s Law Directory. *An AV certification mark is a significant rating accomplishment – a testament to the fact that a lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence. |
Civil Appellate Litigation / Complex Motion Practice / Appellate Printing / Strategic Trial ConsultationThe firm specializes in counseling attorneys and clients at the trial level. The firm also researches, composes and argues appeals before all New York state and federal courts.
David P. Cherundolo
Strout & Payson P.A.
Eric M. Martin Attorney
Patrick H. Tate P.A.
The Ted Kanner Law Office
Conliffe Sandmann & Sullivan
John R. Hakanson
Hoeppner Wagner & Evans LLP
Law Offices of Roger D. Brown
Farrar Holliman Medley & Butler
Teller Hassell & Hopson LLP
Steven J. Gaba Attorney & Counselor at Law
Watson Spence LLP
Robert J. Och
Baskin Eisel Rightmyer Attorneys at Law
Brogan & Brogan
